Handwriting Fonts

by Allan Haley

Hand­writ­ing fonts are hot. In our digital world of zeros and ones, on and off, black and white, hand­writ­ing fonts are a bit quirky. They evoke quickly writ­ten notes — but more delib­er­ately than a scrawl. We sell a lot of hand­writ­ing fonts on Fonts.com and we are con­sid­er­ing adding more to our offering.

Hand­writ­ing fonts are some­what less soph­ist­ic­ated than formal scripts. They lack the refine­ment of most cal­li­graphic designs. They dif­fer from cas­ual scripts in that their char­ac­ters are not made from flow­ing brush strokes. They are rarely subtle, and some­times are actu­ally in-your-face. And, yet, they def­in­itely have their own beauty as well as a “cer­tain some­thing.” Used appro­pri­ately, they make their point with speed and style.

A hand­writ­ing font does not have a per­son­al­ity per se — the usage cre­ates the per­son­al­ity. But a hand­writ­ing font does have a per­sona or atti­tude, affect­ing the con­tent in a dis­tinct­ive way. Hand­writ­ing scripts can be edgy, laid-back, play­ful, or ingenu­ous. You wouldn’t want to set more than a couple of words in one of them. (If you did, the repeated idio­syn­cratic char­ac­ters would call atten­tion to them­selves, mak­ing the copy look con­trived.) They are, how­ever, per­fect designs for logo­types and word­marks, posters and head­lines. They are also ideal for suc­ces­sions of words not in big blocks of text. Such uses include invit­a­tions, menus, cer­ti­fic­ates and cap­tions. These pieces, whether on a page, a sign, a ban­ner or a screen, seem per­sonal, like cor­res­pond­ence — per­haps because of the rel­at­ively quiet way in which they’re read. So, even though part of your brain knows it’s not pro­cessing a per­sonal note, the piece “feels” a bit like one.

Please let us know if you are inter­ested in see­ing more of these kinds of fonts avail­able from Fonts.com

4 Responses to “Handwriting Fonts”

  1. Albert says:

    I really find Brad­ley Hand to be a bad typeface. I don’t think it has very much char­ac­ter. Like Comic Sans, non-designers seem to use it in fli­ers and other print to give a laid-back feel. How­ever, I think it just looks clunky and ama­teur­ish, espe­cially when there are so many hand­writ­ing fonts that work more effectively.

  2. I do not use hand­writ­ing typefaces that often, but recently had to use them on two sep­ar­ate occa­sions which made me won­der about a grow­ing trend. I found find­ing the right typefaces a bit more chal­len­ging than nor­mal, as the hand­writ­ing really needed to reflect not only a com­pany but a per­son­al­ity within that com­pany. It seems that there was an extra set of para­met­ers involved, and I had to reflect both a per­son and a firm. Atti­tude and per­sona def­in­itely played a huge hand in my decision.

  3. Sandy Naidu says:

    I like to use these fonts for cre­at­ing my sig­na­tures for my blogs — I don’t usu­ally have my real sig­na­ture here (As it can be copied). I like to cre­ate a sig­na­ture using these hand­writ­ing fonts.

  4. Pretty cool post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really liked brows­ing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be sub­scrib­ing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

Leave a Reply